Various Locations and Years --
It has occurred to Grumpy that not enough publicity has been made of his ever-burgeoning descendants of the 4th generation. To at least make a "dent" in this oversight, here is his attempt at rectifying this situation (photo credits generally to the respective parents):
Starting with the oldest* of the youngest are these two, close and tow-headed brothers, Jamey G and Arthur:
Next are these two Mermaids (or is that "MUD-maids?), Abby and Amelia, who are close cousins of the above pair (they are tow-headed, too!):
Then we have this "crew" of wild "Zimmer-offsprings", Malachi**, Amos, Elianna and Ezekiel:
Not to be soon forgotten are Emileigh and the newest of all, three-week old Oliver:
And we can never forget these charming Great Granddaughters, Hanali, Heidi and Hailey:
And finally, to end this expose Grumpy proudly presents this "finding" -- not under a flat rock, but on top -- Gracie-Mae and Zach:
Stay tuned! The Grand Mother and Grumpy have "reason" to suspect more of these varmints will appear in the future! For one thing, we have no recent photos of the Great Grandchildren who live far away on the East Coast (some of the above are from as far back as 2008!); we hope to close that gap soon.
*[Corrected data, May 10th, 2010--Ed]
**[Previously mistaken identity -- sorry! Ed]
*[Corrected data, May 10th, 2010--Ed]
**[Previously mistaken identity -- sorry! Ed]
Grumpy, Thank you for this delightful pictorial accounting of some of your many great grandchildren.
ReplyDeleteFor the record, your chronology is somewhat mistaken.
If you're tracking birth order of the grandchildren of your second son, it is:
Jamey, Arthur, Abigail then Amelia.
Arthur appeared a mere three months before Abby.
Sir James, you are so right!! But then, I am only the Great Grandpa -- memory is the talent of the Great Grandma, remember.
ReplyDeleteAbove you will find this Post edited with your corrections. Thanks for the alert!!
The picture of Malachi is not here. You have two pictures of Amos! Better check your picture stash, as I am sure Malachi will be found in some of them. If not, I will happily provide one for you.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous: Please see excuse proffered to Sir James, above.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the correction; it has been incorporated.